Tue 3 Jan 2006
From this week’s New Yorker. Much of the article is basically Angel’s wistfully lamenting the fact that modern-day athletes, because of their outlandish physiques, ridiculous salaries, and, in his words, “infantile tastes” are somehow less accessible than they were when he grew up in the 1930s watching good salt-of-the-earth guys like Hank Greenberg and Jimmy Foxx, and that their personalities — what’s Roger Clemens really like? — are bound to leave us disappointed when contrasted to their excellence on the field. But, to his credit, he catches himself from this false nostalgia and makes the point that we sports fans shouldn’t concern ourselves with the fact that Shaq has a Superman beadspread or that Tiki has a gigantic mural of himself in his son’s bedroom; these guys still provide us with something sublime and mesmerizing on the field of play. That is all they can give us, that is all that is fair to ask of them, and that is enough.
He is midsized and not particularly fast as running backs go, but here he was, again cruising close to his blockers and then finding the hole or the invisible seam and driving for yardage before disappearing under a vanload of tacklers. The Giants scored a couple of field goals and a touchdown on a pass from Eli Manning to Amani Toomer, but the play of the day was a second-quarter run by Tiki, around the left side and then brilliantly back and forth between grasping and flying frustrated Chief defensemen, forty-one yards, for a touchdown. He ran some more after that, driving in for the twenty-yard clinching touchdown late in the day—it was night by now, and you kept your eye on his gleaming blue helmet in motion, always a little lower than the rest. In the end, he’d run two hundred and twenty yards from scrimmage—and away from us, you might say—for a franchise record, and had compiled 1,577 rushing yards for the season, breaking the team record he set last year.
January 4th, 2006 at 6:52 pm
Don’t “infantile tastes” make these guys far more accessible?
But I guess I can’t fairly expect an 80 year old New Yorker scribe to appreciate the beauty of gaudy whips and stripper poles, let alone Clinton Portis.
January 4th, 2006 at 7:14 pm
Yes and no — I mean, it’s great laughing at them and everything, but I don’t know…. Why don’t you check this out and then tell me what you think…
http://www.deadspin.com/sports/nba/athlete-runins-the-angry-tim-duncan-grrr-138038.php
January 5th, 2006 at 1:30 am
hehe, yeah, i read that a while ago. it’s pretty fucking funny. “now being a trained martial artist, i was able to subdue duncan despite the fact that i gave up 1 foot and 100 pounds.”
OK, i made that quote up, but this one was actually written: “he is stunned by my audacity, like the lion regarding the mouse that roared.” This one is also verbatim: “I ended up going home with the pretty brunette he had been harassing, having played her knight-in-shining-flannel.” Sounds pretty accurate and believable to me.
But I did once hear from a friend of a friend who was at Wake when Duncan was there that Timmy smoked tons of herb, in his room, alone. That’s certainly sick in its own way, but it’s also more consistant with the notion of Duncan as a shy islander who’s addicted to video games.
I’ll look for that Angel piece, but I have to believe that Tiki Barber is far more relatable than your average New Yorker writer.