Mon 15 Dec 2008
We’ll get to the game later on, but first, some historical perspective:
As much as we all suspended judgment after the Eagles game, it’s now time to face the facts: During the past two games, a Giants Super Bowl title has gone from probable to possible. Yes, I know, calling a Super Bowl ring “probable†is a little illogical. But let’s just say that going into last week’s game, we would have been absolutely crushed if the Giants continued their success only to come up short in the playoffs. That outcome, a nightmarish worst-case scenario eight days ago, doesn’t seem unlikely now.
As evidenced by last year, championships are determined by which team is playing its best when the playoffs come. After Week 15, with only two games to reverse the trend, it’s safe to say the Giants are not playing as well as some other teams. The Panthers are kicking some serious ass. The Cowboys and Eagles just beat us soundly. The Vikings have started to peak, and the Falcons are no cakewalk.
So we’ve fallen from the lofty perch we’ve occupied all season. The dream-like run in which wins came easy is over. We are now immersed in the same desperate struggle as every other team.
That’s the bad news. The good news is that Tom Coughlin’s Giants are uniquely equipped to weather this situation. Perhaps during that 11-1 start we forgot that this is the Giants we’re talking about, a franchise whose identity is tied to a belief that anything worthwhile does not come easy. It didn’t come easy last year, and it didn’t come easy in 1990, the most apt historical comparison if you want to be optimistic.
That year, a 10-0 start gave way to a 3-3 finish, with losses to the Eagles, 49ers, and Bills and thoroughly uninspiring wins against the mediocre Vikings, the lowly Cardinals, and the pathetic Patriots. We were written off, dropped by the experts from the ranks of the elite, but we kept grinding, eventually winning a championship that, like, 2007, owed itself to the team’s mental fortitude. Indeed, at their best, the Giants don’t dazzle, they grind.
Tom Coughlin’s Giants are a proud bearer of this standard of resilience. So while it may not look like it now, this is where we want to be. We don’t want to be above the fray, entering the playoffs with a dazzling 15-1 record. We want to be in the fight. Because there isn’t a team I like more in a fight than the G-Men.
December 15th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Hey Greg,
I see what your saying and you’re correct that the Giants never make things easy. But I want a game breakdown of this HORRIBLE peformance that the Gmen gave us loyal fans yesterday. To not ever muster one touchdown is something I never thought would happen. Our offensive line was thinner than Tony Kornheisers hair. What happened to those fatties? Dixon keep dropping passes like their a unlicensed gun in the VIP section of a Manhattan nightclub! He’s luck those footballs aren’t loaded because he’d be shot in a place far worst than the leg. He needs to make some plays and it sucks that the whole Plaxico mess is what’s getting the attention and I think it’s really affecting the team. Anyway, I want to vent a bit and i was looking forward to another one of your stellar breakdowns of what went wrong yesterday. We need Jacobs but he seems compromised with a bum knee and the other two backs are not doing well. I agree that we should have faith in Tom Coughlin but yesterday’s game exposed us and we need to bounce back with a W against Carolina next week to keep home-advantage. I hope we can pull it off. PS-I hate that the NFL flexed that game to 8pm. I didnt’ want the Giants to play primetime because I hate all of the unnecessary attention they call to the off-field issues with our team. And now Pierce is all over the Post! We need to get a W badly.
December 15th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Greg, Enjoy your insight as you are and one other site are the only ones with intelligent an perspective. Only wish you posted more often but understand that the grind rules all our lives.
Historically speaking could never deny the above and that what makes being a Gmen fan so predictable and ulcer ridden. But, I do have a major concern with the OC. The last 2 games the opposing Ds attacked the O in the same manner yet the idiot Gilbride fails to make adjsutments. Just look at how Garrett adjusted to the Gs aggressive D scheme which battered Romeo. He ran screens, quick slants to the TE and WRs, RB routes and draws (earlier on). Yet our OC just doesn’t get reality?? Without Burress and a healthy Jacobs he is now getting exposed as an incompetent OC that once got popped in the face by his fellow DC.
What’s your take on this or am I way off base and missing something?? Bradshaw continues to be underutilized as well as Boss.